I also wish that people would judge a section by its own merits rather than the guide as a whole. As a guide maker, nothing makes me happier than a player who tried out the guide and build and gave feedback.
Long story short, I'm considering archiving it and making them a bunch of separate guides.
Should I? Or is it more convenient to have a big resource in one guide?
I think it differentiates the "meta" junglers from the, well, insane junglers very well. Splitting them could make it harder for new players to determine which is which. But that's really the only problem I see from separating them, so go for it.
Meta? What meta? (jk, jk)
I think you could undertake each individual guide, and make your Insane Jungler's Guide an overarching meta guide. Each section to give a brief summary, and put a link to your actual, full guide for the god inside the section. That way someone can skim it, and if they find interest, go to a more in depth guide.
Of course that's a lot of work, but it's a very smart idea! Kind of like our signatures where we shamelessly self-promote our own guides (myself included xD), but inside an actual guide as a sort of, well, archive, without the guide itself being archived.
But that'd take a lot of work, so that's up to you, sir!
That's a pretty good idea.
I got the Insane Jungler idea from this huge guide I saw once. I thought a gigantic guide was too ambitious, so I decided to make a guide series of the weirder junglers.
It'd also save me the time of trying to figure out how to fit 10 or so guides into one signature.
Of course that's a lot of work, but it's a very smart idea! Kind of like our signatures where we shamelessly self-promote our own guides (myself included xD), but inside an actual guide as a sort of, well, archive, without the guide itself being archived.
But that'd take a lot of work, so that's up to you, sir!